Saturday, December 5, 2009

Our Diigo Bookmarks This Week


Posted from Diigo. The rest of CTL Leaders group favorite links are here.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Our Diigo Bookmarks This Week

  • This competency listing is divided into three main groups, Core Competencies, Leadership Competencies, and Professional Competencies. These three groups of competencies can be thought of as the Pyramid of Leadership, which collectively form the basic requirements for becoming a leader. Since this site has a lot of readers interested in the training/learning craft, the professional competencies have been directed toward learning and training leaders.

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • This is a literature review that applies the main theories of transactional, transformational, charismatic and contingency leadership to the academic environment and our focus on scholarship/research and teaching practice

    Tags: academic, leadership, theory, practice

    • The concept of leadership has been around for centuries beginning with Plato’s belief that leaders are created based on his or her class position, whereas, current leaders are created based on his or her relationships with other individuals. In August 1994, 54 researchers from 38 countries gathered for the first GLOBE research conference, and during this conference the researchers came to a consensus on the universal definition of leadership (House, Javidan, & Dorfman, 2001): the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members. A leader’s upbringing, life experiences, and daily interactions define his or her leadership style. The difference between a
      good leader and a
      great leader is his or her ability to adapt to change (Collins, 2001). Good leaders tend to follow his or her leadership plans even when the leadership plan is not working, but a great leader will adjust his or her leadership plans accordingly.
    • This paper used the scholarship, practice, and leadership model to determine the future effectiveness of transformational, transactional, contingent, and charismatic leadership styles through knowledge management, informatics / innovations and rapid change, and ethics.
  • Paths to leadership positions: a comparison between higher ed. and corporate worlds.

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • In the university initiative described in this article, a series of project teams were funded to work on a variety of collaborative projects. The focus of this piece is on the framework that was developed and executed to select, support, and evaluate these teams. The framework is explained and described using data gathered throughout the study and discussed using Kolb's components of organizational support for teams.

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • This article describes one university's approach to developing collaborative alliances within the university and between members of the university community and stakeholders in the community.

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • Higher-education administrators and faculty members should not focus so much on today's financial concerns that they lose sight of such pressing issues. The problems are complex and interconnected, spilling across academic disciplines and often across national borders. Solutions will require theoretical knowledge and practical problem-solving skills, including the capacity to build and lead teams drawn from a variety of disciplines. They will require leaders who can cross boundaries of science, policy, geography, theory, and practice. In other words, they will require a new generation of sustainable-development practitioners.

    Tags: teams, leaders, leadership

  • This article from Academic Leadership Live gets right to the heart of one of the biggest needs and challenges in higher education--assessment of student learning--and makes valuable suggestions for engaging faculty as leaders. Only through doing so, Don Haviland argues, can assessment become the core of how we do things instead of the latest bureaucratic accountability swirl.

    Tags: assessment, faculty, leading, leadership, academic

    • Yet while it has outlasted many other higher education reforms, assessment of student learning (arguably) seems to have stalled as a vehicle for transforming higher education. Yes, data collection is happening in many places and there are pockets of excellence (e.g., Alverno College, Truman State), but assessment is hardly a mature endeavor, tied in to the planning and budgeting processes, retention and tenure expectations, or the culture of much of higher education (Wright 2002). Much assessment focuses on student satisfaction and post-college success (as opposed to actual learning), while few investigations of learning address high-level or complex cognitive skills (Peterson and Vaughan 2002).
    • Much assessment takes place because of accreditation expectations, conducted with a compliance mentality and doing little to transform faculty or institutional practice.
    • Angelo (2002) argues that for a scholarship of assessment to thrive, we must align faculty culture, institutional structures, and leadership for change.
    • It is up to us as leaders to create a climate where it is not accreditation that drives assessment, but rather a process of inquiry (driven and owned by faculty) that also fulfills accreditation requirements.
    • These assessment leaders should be able to communicate and support the attainment of basic expectations for effective assessment
    • nstitutions must also attend to professional development that will help faculty build a common language and practice of assessment. At one institution, we used weekly learning communities to build faculty skills in effective assessment; department representatives learned about assessment together and then mentored their department colleagues. At another institution, we held monthly workshops where multiple faculty from departments came together for skill-building and shared work time. Faculty valued this approach for the time it gave them to collaborate. Whether it is one of these or some other model, institutions should use ongoing professional development to give faculty the tools for assessment success.
    • Assessment leaders must be able to conceptualize a system, bring people together around a vision, and build cross-unit partnerships that support faculty work. They should be able to orchestrate the process of assessment, helping faculty see and realize the vision of assessment for improvement rather than accountability.
    • Still, institutions should identify one or more faculty members to facilitate or coordinate assessment. Assessment leaders do not need to excel in statistics and measurement; this idea is a misconception based on a focus on the mechanics of working with data.
    • This assessment leader should also be visible. He or she should be able to communicate the values of assessment and the plan for moving forward, as well as reach out to faculty to engage in professional development and share resources. Moreover, he or she should be committed to soliciting the feedback of faculty as assessment work unfolds. Giving faculty clear channels through which they can raise questions about assessment, share concerns, and evaluate the effectiveness of the effort is essential to turning reluctance into buy-in.
    • These leaders cannot be expected to do their work on top of existing faculty duties.
  • This chapter describes a project in which teams of faculty, administrators, and staff from fourteen colleges and universities engaged in organizational learning for the purposes of identifying and improving inequitable educational outcomes for African American and Latino students.

    Tags: teams, leaders, leadership

  • This is the text of Chapter 2 of Ann F. Lucas's book, Leading Academic Change. It was reprinted on the listserv, "Tomorrow's Professor," by permission of the publisher, Jossey-Bass.

    It provides a practical guide (8 steps) to leading change, based on a project at Fairleigh Dickinson University's Department of Management and Marketing. As the author notes in the conclusion, the principles and process can be applied to any academic setting.

    Tags: model, collaborative, leadership, academic, leading, faculty

    • Although this change process was used in a management and marketing
      department, the dynamics of change are the same in any department.
      A leader is needed, one who ca manage resistance and conflict so
      that the department is strengthened and faculty are revitalized
      rather than demoralized by the process.
  • "Team leadership merits continued attention because leaders have an impact on how the team develops and performs. In this article, team processes are explored within self-managed teams that develop different leadership styles. In particular, two leadership styles are compared: shared leadership and single leadership. "

    Tags: teams, leaders, leadership

  • "Recently, there has been growing interest in more fully examining the situational conditions under which the positive effects of charismatic or transformational leadership are actually achieved. The positive impact of transformational leadership on follower performance has received wide support in the literature. However, much less is known about the impact of transformational leadership on team performance."

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • This book chapter is well worth the reading for its analysis of the need for change now in higher education, its review of some of the literature on change, and its helpful description of roles in the change process. Best of all is the 11-step process that Dale Lick and Roger Kaufman (both experienced faculty members who have gone on to consulting careers in university planning and leadership) call The Change Creation Process.

    The article is copyright Jossey-Bass, 2002 and should not be reproduced.

    Full citation: Lick, D. (2002). Leadership and change. In R.M. Diamond (Ed.), Field guide to academic leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Tags: leadership, change, faculty, guide

  • Online copies of all the handouts shared at the Fall 2009 Faculty Development meeting at Ruttger's.

    Tags: facultydevelopment, faculty, ctl, leadership, conference

  • Have you ever been in a group situation where someone took control of the situation by conveying a clear vision of the group’s goals, a marked passion for the work and an ability to make the rest of the group feel recharged and energized? This person just might be what is called a transformational leader.

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • This study was designed to discover which leadership styles executives of environmental advocacy nonprofits used to enhance their inter-organizational collaborative efforts. The study was undertaken in two phases. The first phase asked foundation funders of environmental advocacy organizations to identify who they viewed as being successful leaders of collaborative processes. The second phase involved semi-structured interviews with several of the leaders of collaborations nominated as “successful” by the foundation funders.

    The study includes definitions for a variety of leadership styles and compares each styles character traits.

    Tags: leaders, leadership, teams

  • As there is increased emphasis in universities on helping students acquire the skills they will need to succeed professionally and personally, more instructors are experimenting with student teams. But it is not sufficient to put students in groups and ask them to work together—students need to be taught the skills they will need to function successfully in this kind of situation.

    Tags: leaders, teams

  • Book options for your campus CTL Library.

    Tags: leaders, library, books


Posted from Diigo. The rest of CTL Leaders group favorite links are here.

Friday, November 6, 2009

POD and NCSPOD Conferences

I’ve been on the road for the past couple of weeks attending two national conferences for faculty, professional, and staff development: the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (POD) conference in Houston and the North American Council for Staff, Program and Organizational Development (NCSPOD) conference in St. Paul. These two events and organizations have intersections in faculty and professional development, but have at least one key difference in that NCSPOD encompasses staff development while POD does not.

This was my fourth year at the POD conference and my first year at NCSPOD and it has been interesting to see and hear from conference attendees about the overlap in faculty and staff development. From what I have been able to ascertain, there is little. However, the idea of overlap and collaboration is a good one. In our own center, for example, we are striving to bring together faculty, administrators, and others at MnSCU campuses in order to align efforts toward the betterment of their institutions. In theory, if the institution has a strategic goal of increasing student persistence we can assume that goal will be much easier reached if faculty and staff development efforts are all focused on it.

So, how does this look “on the ground?” I can say from my experience at the NCSPOD conference that it gets complicated. Simply deciding on sessions has been challenging. Sessions that sound on the surface as though they may pertain to my work have turned out to be too focused on the needs of staff. Others that sound as if they have nothing to do with my work very well may have relevant. Taking a step back, I have to admit that some of the language used by the presenters, being foreign to me, may be the only turn-off. This leads me to believe that at least some of our efforts to integrate administrator, staff, and faculty development efforts may be hindered by language barriers. Are we saying the same things, but in the language or vernacular of our areas? Do we need to start by breaking down those language barriers? In your own work on the ground, this may be a good place to start.

More soon on specific POD and NCSPOD conference sessions.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

NCSPOD Comes to the River City


The North American Council for Staff, Professional and Organizational Development is holding their annual conference right here in St. Paul, at the Crowne Plaza Riverfront. I had the pleasure of meeting a lot of these terrific folks last year, when NCSPOD held a joint conference with the POD Network in Higher Education, in Reno. (I've been a member of POD for about 15 years.) It's a great group of faculty and administrators, many of them with responsibility for both faculty and staff development.

I had the privilege of extending an informal welcome last night. Looks like about 150 members will be attending the conference this year. They've got a great program lined up, with our Senior Vice Chancellor Linda Baer introducing keynoter Joel Barker this morning, then tomorrow morning, Century College's Jermaine Davis will provide a keynote.

Barker's talk, just ended, provided an insightful and engaging look at "innovation at the verge." I took away a helpful definition of innovation as distinct from invention (innovators successfully implement!), and good ideas for fostering innovation not in the "center" of an organization, but out at the fringes, where the culture is verging on another culture/ecosystem/organization, etc.

Next year's NCSPOD conference will be in Vancouver, BC. I hope to present some of the innovative work we're planning at CTL to complete this year.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Welcoming Faculty by Meeting Their Specific Disciplinary Needs

This POD session I attended provided several good strategies for centers to encourage participation by specific disciplines. Most faculty development opportunities are created with a general audience in mind. Some faculty do not see how these broad ideas apply to their teaching.

IUPUI is moving to a more discipline-based approach for the following reasons:

  • Broad impact
  • Increase relevance
  • Respond to administrative feedback

A general center's approach ideas

  • Cooperative learning
  • Pedagogical language
  • Come to us meetings, our center's area
  • Get a faculty member “plant” to help to spark discussion (new faculty with veteran faculty) and facilitated discipline-specific ideas and questions.
  • Tend to fill all the time with content…. And little time for reflection and application for their discipline
  • Much of the language comes from education and philosophy
  • Broad general examples
  • State with learning principle then apply to content
  • Marketing programming to a broad audience

Discipline-based approach

  • Cooperative learning in the discipline
  • Examples provided for in the discipline
  • Identify culture, understood ideas, use discipline-specific language. Use discipline-specific vocabulary, define or avoid using unfamiliar terms.
  • Go to their areas, meeting to share strategies based on their way of teaching
  • Meet in the environment used in the workshop to model the topic, i.e lecture-auditorium, hands-on-clinical or shop, etc.
  • Give them the tools and resources for their discipline
  • Co-facilitate with a member from the discipline
  • In larger group workshops, have disciplines sit together for great discussion and application.
  • Examples that use disciplinary content
  • Start with problem in the content then give general principle
  • Customizing the programming to disciplinary audiences.


In a Discipline Cultural Experiment...

Non-science faculty experienced introductory science courses and reported having trouble following lectures. The stated that the material was interesting, but when difficult to understand the mind froze. They were used to a demonstration….. explanation model of science.

Science faculty experienced a poetry course and found the use of language only was very difficult. There were no visuals, nothing on the board, or an outline - only a lecture with language. Some reported that they were so distracted by others who were furiously trying to keep up by taking notes.

What does this mean to us? Reach the disciplinary intructors with their culture.

A source: Bridging Cultures (McAlpine and Harris, 1999)

  1. Understanding comes from disciplinary specifics.
  2. Knowledge Domains Impacting Teaching and Learning

  • Subject matter knowledge – content within the discipline
  • Pedagogical knowledge – general knowledge about teaching
  • Pedagogical content knowledge – intersection of pedagogies applied to the discipline


Using both explicit and tacit knowledge… some instructors have tremendous tacit knowledge and may not be able to effectively talk about it. Working together with faculty developers, instructors can explicit pedagogical content knowledge.

Faculty development is often promoting a student centered approach, but rarely do we share information in a teacher-centered way. We need to meet them where they are….. faculty centered.

  • Faculty–centered professional development
  • Learner-centered teaching
  • Faculty developer as facilitator

What does faculty-centered discipline-specific professional development means in practical terms for a center?

  • Staff must represent many types of disciplines
  • Does our center promote an agenda or mission to share a certain kind of teaching?
  • Keep track of campus visits (location) and disciplines to be sure we get all over.
  • Renaming workshops to make fit disciplines.

Our Process…. Our Journey IUPUI

  • Advisory Board
  • New Leader Transition process
  • Revision of the Center’s Vision, Mission, and development of Strategic Planning Actions and Intentions
  • STEM specialist hired
  • CTL Retreat to discuss programming and a new grant program.
Going to POD allows a chance to observe successful programs and centers. It is great to know that our own CTL has had these processes in place for several years.

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Can “Tired” Faculty be Rejuvenated?

The session focused on a study of 72 campus CTLs who responded to a survey on what practices made the biggest positive impact to help “tired” faculty. For the study, “tired” faculty were defined as those who were 50 and older, senior faculty having rank and tenure.

Participants were asked to rank 11 development activities

1. Create mentoring programs – “tired” faculty mentor younger faculty
2. Reflect on teaching and learning – highly structured facilitated meetings for senior faculty which featured open ended questions about their philosophy of teaching and learning and their ideas about why they became an academic, building their career, and frustrations.
3. Develop additional teaching skills – including lecturing clearly, assessing student learning, effective use of technology, cheating/plaguerism, and working with difficult students.
4. Videotape classroom instruction – setting up a pre-recording about the focus of the teaching and how the teaching is done. Recording is the property of the faculty.
5. Provide financial resource help – grant support for instructional resources and course development
6. Combine student ratings with skillful consultation – simple, practical suggestions
7. Facilitate innovation in the classroom – ideas to help increase use of technology, group work, service learning to improve student learning
8. Encourage short-term, non-teaching assignments – having faculty become a dean, work with assessment, etc. for a given amount of time.
9. Help faculty give something back to the community – work on major projects: new faculty orientation, fund raising, task forces to improve student learning.
10. Encourage interdisciplinary or team teaching
11. Support faculty exchanges – year at another institution, fellow for new inst. Policies/procedures, Fullbright.

Survey Results

Especially effective development activities were:

  • Create mentoring programs
  • Combine student ratings with skillful consultation
  • Encourage short-term, non-teaching assignments
  • Reflect on teaching and learning

Somewhat effective development activities were:

  • Develop additional teaching skills
  • Videotape classroom instructions
  • Provide financial resource help

Least effective development activities were:

  • Support faculty exchanges
  • Encourage interdisciplinary or team teaching
  • Support faculty exchanges

These activities may offer the beginning of a conversation with faculty development teams as they look at ways to develop programming to motivate “tired” mid- and later-career faculty.

Friday, October 30, 2009

POD Session: Educational gobbledygook: Does language discourage faculty from becoming faculty developers?

David Green from Seattle University led this session sharing the results of a comparison study of educational research literature to discipline based literature. Faculty from the U.S. and the U.K. participated in the study. The session participants were asked to show on a grid as to how they prefer to gain their knowledge based on the scales of simple to complex language and simple to complex ideas. The was a correlation of responses between the study’s and the session’s participants.

How this applies to our work as CTL system and campus faculty developers is to be sure that we use a more simple language to describe the simple and complex ideas which is what faculty prefer. Providing this language, is critical to help other faculty feel comfortable to join our ranks as faculty developers and supporters. Few faculty have the time to learn a new complex language, whether perceived or real. Once again, we hear that the KISS philosophy applies in the language we use in discussing educational research.